|
I’ve got MB 2011, and I can see posts by users saying they went back to 2010 from 2011 even though it required a lot of work to do so.
I’m considering the 2012 suite (encouraged that AD finally released a service pack for 3ds Max’s CAT that should have been released for 2012), but ... if I’m just buying a lot of new bugs rather than bug fixes, I’d rather hold off - and lots of folks seem to regard 2012 as ‘beta’ software.
How is 2012 working? Is it a usable tool, especially compared to previous versions?
Or is AD just focusing on integrating its features into Maya (and hopefully 3ds?)
BTW - I’m happy to throw money at a problem, but if I do, I want it fixed.
Stability and lack of bugs are way more important to me than new features - and if a 201X Suite from AD just claimed ‘we fixed all the bugs and added NO new features’, I WOULD BUY IT IN A FLASH.
Thanks!
|
|
|